Tag: weather-smart fundamentals forecasting

Weather-Smart Forecast Q2 Report Summary

David Luke Oates
Solar Wind Energy - Q2 Weather-Smart Forecasts
David Luke Oates, author of Weather-Smart Forecast Q2 Report Summary
Author: David Luke Oates
SVP of Power Markets Research

In late 2022, we announced the availability of Weather-Smart fundamentals power price forecasts. These forecasts give our customers unprecedented insight into the connection between weather, fundamentals, and value. Using REsurety’s suite of products and services, customers can determine the value of clean energy projects under expected conditions, stress test downside risk, and quantify potential upside. They can assemble and monitor portfolios of assets that help mitigate correlated risks. And they can quantify the carbon impact of clean generation, storage, and power consumption, accounting for location, timing, and a changing grid.

We recently updated our Weather-Smart forecasts for ERCOT and PJM. We have also released forecasts for CAISO for the first time. These forecasts are now available across REsurety’s offerings. Accompanying this release, our customers have also received our new Q2 Weather-Smart report. This report provides customers with increased visibility into the methodology and input data driving our forecasts, giving them what they need to make better decisions using our forecast data. The report also provides a summary of high-level takeaways and discusses the changes in our outlook since the previous release.

Our Q2 2023 Weather-Smart forecasts provide forward-looking views of Around the Clock (ATC) power prices, market heat rates, wind and solar capture rates, and Locational Marginal Emissions rates (LMEs) for a selection of hubs in ERCOT, PJM, and CAISO. Forecasts include five fundamental scenarios and represent over 40 years of weather variability. Some of our high-level takeaways include:

  • Solar Buildout Drove Capture Rate Shifts: Similar to last quarter, our modeling shows substantial reductions in solar capture rates as solar buildout ramps up. The speed of the decrease depends on fundamentals, weather, and market, with CAISO showing particularly low capture rates due to large existing and planned solar penetration. Our results show it is unlikely for solar to retain greater than 100% capture rates for very long in those markets where capture rates have historically been positive.
  • Weather and Fundamentals Continued to Drive Meaningful Capture Rate Variability: Capture rates (calculated with ISO-average generation) vary by approximately 60 percentage points for solar and approximately 30 percentage points for wind for some markets and forward years. Even larger ranges of capture rates are expected when considering site-specific generation profiles.
  • Gas Prices Largely Continued to Fall: Since our Q1-2023 release, gas forwards have fallen across most forward years and locations, with slight near-term increases. Henry Hub prices are down ~$0.25/MMBTU in 2024, up a similar amount in 2025-27, and down by as much as $1.50/MMBTU through 2040. This generally reduced ATC power prices, increased market heat rates, and reduced wind and solar capture rates.
  • PJM Supply Stack Tightened: PJM generator online and retirement dates were updated. The net result of this change was a material reduction to natural gas and solar capacity in the near term, with a slight increase in wind capacity. This change boosted market heat rates.
  • PJM Maintenance Refined: Generator maintenance schedules were refined to avoid periods of excessive supply/demand tightness in May. This change improved the quality of our seasonal backcasts and forecasts and slightly reduced modeled market heat rates.
  • CAISO Market Added: Results are now available for CAISO’s NP15, SP15, and ZP26 hubs. CAISO ATC prices are generally higher than ERCOT and PJM primarily due to higher gas prices. Near-term wind capture rates are generally above ERCOT and below PJM, but trend up over time in contrast to those markets. In contrast, solar capture rates are materially lower than in ERCOT and PJM and decline over time.

If you are a forecast customer of REsurety, this report is included in your service. If you’re interested in learning more about REsurety, this report, and other products and services, please reach out to [email protected] or request a demo.

About the author

David Luke Oates co-leads REsurety’s Research team. His team builds, tests, and deploys fundamentals and statistical models of electricity prices and emissions to support customer workflows. David Luke has over a decade of experience working in the electric power sector from positions in academia, consulting, and technology. Before joining REsurety, he was a consultant at The Brattle Group, supporting electricity market operators, utilities, and asset owners to address market design, asset valuation, and regulatory questions.

Dr. Oates holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University and a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics from Queen’s University, Canada.

Weather-Smart Forecast Q1 Report Summary

David Luke Oates, author of Weather-Smart Forecast Q1 Report Summary
Author: David Luke Oates, SVP of Power Markets Research

In late 2022, we announced the availability of Weather-Smart fundamentals power price forecasts. These forecasts give our customers unprecedented insight into the connection between weather, fundamentals, and value. Using REsurety’s suite of products and services, customers can determine the value of clean energy projects under expected conditions, stress test downside risk, and quantify potential upside. They can assemble and monitor portfolios of assets that help mitigate correlated risks. And they can quantify the carbon impact of clean generation, storage, and power consumption, accounting for location, timing, and a changing grid.

We recently updated our Weather-Smart forecasts for ERCOT and PJM. These forecasts are now available across REsurety’s offerings. Accompanying this release, our customers have also received our new report. This report provides customers with increased visibility into the methodology and input data driving our forecasts, giving them what they need to make better decisions using our forecast data. The report also provides a summary of high-level takeaways and discusses the changes in our outlook since the previous release.

REsurety's Q1 2023 Weather-Smart Forecast Report for ERCOT and PJM.

Our Q1 2023 Weather-Smart forecasts provide forward-looking views of Around the Clock (ATC) power prices, market heat rates, wind and solar capture rates, and Locational Marginal Emissions rates (LMEs) for a selection of hubs in ERCOT and PJM. Forecasts include five fundamental scenarios and represent 40 years of weather variability. Some of our high-level takeaways include:

  • Solar Buildout Drives Capture Rate Shifts: Our modeling consistently shows substantial reductions in solar capture rates as solar buildout ramps up. The speed of the decrease depends on fundamentals, weather, and market. But our results show it is unlikely for solar to retain greater than 100% capture rates for very long.
  • Weather and Fundamentals Drive Meaningful Capture Rate Variability: Capture rates (calculated with ISO-average generation) vary by approximately 60 percentage points for solar and approximately 30 percentage points for wind for some markets and forward years. Even larger ranges of capture rates are expected when considering site-specific generation profiles.
  • Gas Prices Are Down: Since our Q4 2022 release, gas forwards dropped by more than $4/MMBTU in the near term and about $1-$2 across the forecast horizon. This change reduced near-term ATC power prices, increased market heat rates, and reduced wind and solar capture rates.
  • Demand Up in ERCOT: ERCOT revised up its peak demand forecast by 3-6 GW across the forecast horizon, reflecting growth in LNG, oil and gas exploration, and chemical industry demand. This change contributed to an overall tightening of the supply/demand balance in ERCOT, resulting in higher ATC prices, lower wind and solar capture rates, and more weather-driven volatility.
  • ERCOT Near-Term Solar Installations Increased: Mostly due to 2022 realized additions exceeding expectations, baseline solar capacity by 2025 is about 5 GW higher than our previous release. This increase contributed to increased wind capture rates and reduced solar capture rates in the near term.
  • Congestion Tightened: Model refinements led to increased hub-to-hub congestion in ERCOT, with near-term forecasted values consistent with recent observations. On a 10-year forecasted average basis, Houston Hub ATC prices now exceed Panhandle Hub by about $9/MWh.

If you are a forecast customer of REsurety, this report is included in your service. If you’re interested in learning more about REsurety, this report, and other products and services, please reach out to [email protected].

About the author

David Luke Oates leads REsurety’s Power Markets Research team. His team builds, tests, and deploys fundamentals and statistical models of electricity prices and emissions to support customer workflows. David Luke has over a decade of experience working in the electric power sector from positions in academia, consulting, and technology. Before joining REsurety, he was a consultant at The Brattle Group, supporting electricity market operators, utilities, and asset owners to address market design, asset valuation, and regulatory questions.

Dr. Oates holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University and a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics from Queen’s University, Canada.

Weather-Smart Fundamentals Modeling Gives More Meaningful Power Price Forecasts

Jessica Tomaszewski, author of Weather-Smart Fundamentals Modeling Gives More Meaningful Power Price Forecasts
Author: Jessica Tomaszewski
Senior Research Scientist

Forecasting of power prices is a part of everyday life for the renewables industry. Accurate power price forecasts are necessary to support the green energy transition by empowering investment, procurement, and financial-planning workflows of buyers, sellers, and investors of clean energy.

There are two primary types of models used to forecast power prices: Statistical Models and Fundamentals Models. Statistical models learn relationships between prices and other variables based on previously observed outcomes and apply these relationships to make predictions about the real world. Such models are useful in short-term, high-frequency workflows like near-term trading, where market behavior is not expected to deviate significantly from recent history. However, statistical models struggle in longer-term applications where evolving grid mixes, generation technologies, and market designs mean that the future will look different than the past. Fundamentals models can capture the impact of these changes, which is key for making long-term predictions of power prices.

Fundamentals models offer users the benefits of extendability, flexibility, and transparency in their predictions. However, the heavy computational burden of these models has traditionally required price forecasters to make simplifying assumptions about the weather. Much of the industry uses a “Weather-Normal” or “Typical Meteorological Year” to represent forward-looking weather conditions in their price models. But “atypical” meteorological conditions like heat waves, cold snaps, and severe storms can all cause dramatic surges in electricity demand, alter wind and solar supply, and affect prices. A price model that only uses a typical meteorological year will miss the extreme prices that come with extreme weather, resulting in a dramatically different modeled outcome from the true range of expected possibilities.

REsurety has taken a different, Weather-Smart approach: Our price model captures the hourly signal of 40 representative weather years in a computationally efficient way, unlocking several key benefits to customers of our fundamentals-based price models.

Key Benefits of Weather Variability in Price Models

A More Representative Mean

Weather variability is an important driver of the economics of any type of clean energy project, but storage is particularly sensitive to atypical weather conditions. For storage projects engaging in energy arbitrage, profitability relies on buying energy when prices are low and discharging it when prices are high. Energy arbitrage becomes more lucrative as the spread between high and low prices increases. Forecasting price using a weather-normal year results in inaccurate forecasts of storage value because it misses the extremes of price that drive value for storage resources. Simply put, weather-normal modeling materially undervalues the energy arbitrage revenue opportunity of storage projects.

When adequate weather variability is represented in a price model, the predicted mean value of a storage project will better reflect these high price events, as illustrated in the schematic below. Two cases are considered. The blue line represents the case with a distribution of daily forecasted storage project values created using prices produced by a Weather-Smart model fed with the signal of 40 weather years. The second case represents in green the distribution of daily storage values based on prices produced by modeling a single weather-normal year of data. While both distributions of storage project value report a similar median, the Weather-Smart distribution produces a mean value that is significantly higher than its median. In this case, the mean can serve as a simple, single quantity that distills the potential profitability of a storage project in a way that acknowledges the extreme events contributing to its value.

The benefit of Weather-Smart distributions: Including adequate weather variability produces a mean value that acknowledges extreme weather and price events.

Visibility into Range

REsurety’s fundamentals price model gives users unique insight into their price forecasts, and by modeling hourly weather variability representative of 40 years, we elevate this insight to give visibility into a broad range of outcomes. For example, a forecast driven by a weather-normal year of input data will give a forecasted wind capture rate for a typical summer, perhaps at 80%. But how can a clean energy buyer set expectations with their financial planning team in the event of a warmer-than-average summer with lower-than-average wind speeds that yields a capture rate of only 60%? A wide distribution of potential outcomes exists depending on the weather conditions, and visibility into this range of outcomes is important for making financial decisions and planning for downside scenarios. This approach is outlined in greater depth in another REsurety blog post.

Better-Informed Portfolio Optimization

Visibility into range provided by Weather-Smart price forecasts lends itself to better portfolio optimization as well. Portfolio risk mitigation is possible through understanding the tails of distributions of individual assets, which price models with awareness of adequate weather variability can provide. By optimizing portfolios to include assets that provide value in countering scenarios, the overall portfolio risk can be narrowed. For example, a forecasted summer month that has low wind speeds and high temperatures will likely be profitable for solar projects, which can help offset low wind value or Fixed Volume Swap losses. A Weather-Smart price model that is aware of such anomalous weather conditions allows for this kind of portfolio optimization.

About the author
Jessica Tomaszewski is an atmospheric scientist with experience in boundary layer meteorology, numerical weather prediction, and wind resource assessment. Prior to joining REsurety, Jessica completed a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship with a focus on simulating interactions between wind farms and the lower atmosphere, as well as two summer internships at NextEra Analytics investigating improvements to the wind farm wake modeling process. As a research scientist at REsurety, she builds and investigates new techniques for analyzing renewable resources and mitigating their financial risk.

Jessica holds a PhD and Master’s degree in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences from the University of Colorado. She also holds a Bachelor’s degree in Meteorology from the University of Oklahoma. Learn more about Jessica here.

Return to the blog post main menu.