Tag: energy price

What will U.S. Intervention in Venezuela Mean for Clean Energy Prices?

Venezuela Oil Impact On Clean Energy

REsurety policy experts weigh in.

We’ve been monitoring the 2026 Venezuela intervention closely to understand its impact on domestic natural gas markets. 

Why? 

Because the price of crude oil ripples through the entire energy complex, ultimately dictating the financial health of renewable energy contracts. 

Let us take a moment to explain. 

Global oil production has an indirect yet significant influence on gas availability—specifically through “associated gas” produced in U.S. oil fields. A natural byproduct of drilling for oil is natural gas – It’s a “package deal”—you can’t extract the oil without releasing the gas. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), this byproduct now accounts for approximately 40% of total U.S. natural gas production.

This vast supply of low-cost associated gas serves as the primary fuel source for the thermal plants that set the market-clearing price for power. Because electricity prices are so tightly coupled to these fuel costs, any fluctuation in the natural gas market—driven by global oil trends—becomes a primary driver of long-term power price forecasts, including WeatherSmart forecasts like REsurety’s.

How the ramp up of oil production takes place in Venezuela will make a difference for the future of the clean energy market by shifting the economics of producing, selling, or buying PPAs. 

While change is coming, it’s not arriving overnight. According to recent analysis from Rystad Energy (January 2026), returning Venezuela to its peak production of 3 million barrels per day would require a staggering $183 billion in investment and would not be fully realized until 2040.

REsurety has created three scenarios about future energy prices in the new world order, what this means for clean energy, and trigger moments to watch for along the way – read on to learn more.

What will U.S. Intervention in Venezuela Mean for Clean Energy Prices?

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

ERCOT’s RTC+B: A Multi-Billion Dollar Upgrade for Texas Energy Buyers

A landmark shift has arrived in the Texas wholesale electricity market. 

ERCOT’s Real-Time Co-optimization plus Batteries (RTC+B), which went live on December 5, 2025, brings batteries into the pricing conversation for the first time. This market design is expected to translate into lower prices and more reliability for energy consumers by helping the grid more efficiently reflect supply and demand from a variety of energy production sources.

Here is a breakdown of what the RTC+B changes mean for you as an energy buyer or investor.

What RTC+B Means: The Promise of Lower Costs, Backed by Data

Smarter Pricing, Lower Volatility

If you take away nothing else from this post, remember that RTC+B is the simultaneous co-optimization of both energy and Ancillary Services. Ancillary Services are core operating functions that make the grid run efficiently, like voltage or frequency control through transmission wires, back-up power supply, and more – including batteries. 

By combining the energy itself and the support functions that make the energy flow efficiently, ERCOT can have the flexibility to dispatch resources in real-time – especially batteries – to respond to moment-to-moment shifts in demand.

A Shift in Scarcity Pricing

Until now, ERCOT has used a typical Operating Reserve Demand Curve (ORDC) for pricing, which implements price changes as energy resources on the grid are scarce. Producers of energy who were ready to go online in the case where supply dipped, like batteries, were compensated for it; energy users (demand-side) were incentivized to use less energy or risk paying higher prices. However, this didn’t take into account the difference in value for each of these back-up solutions.

Now, this ORDC for scarcity pricing is being replaced with individual Ancillary Service Demand Curves (ASDCs). These ASDCs create a demand curve for each specific type of ancillary service, showing the value of each of these solutions to grid stability. For the first time, batteries are being incorporated into the bidding process – which could change the game.

Projected Cost Savings

The shift is expected to deliver massive economic benefits. ERCOT’s Independent Market Monitor (IMM) has projected wholesale market savings of $2.5-$6.4 billion annually in reduced energy costs.

The Battery Revolution is Integrated for Stability

The “plus Batteries” (RTC+B) component is a major win for grid reliability and flexibility, benefiting every buyer.

For the first time, Energy Storage Resources (ESRs), like large-scale batteries, are fully integrated and modeled as a single device with a state-of-charge. This allows the real-time market to capture their full capability—both charging (consuming power when it’s cheap and plentiful) and discharging (injecting power during times of peak demand).

This will benefit renewable integration – faster, smarter responses to the uncertainty that comes along with solar and wind power are easier to manage when their generation is combined with backup power from batteries. Better asset utilization can lead to a reduction in total system costs by preventing the wasteful curtailment of clean, free solar power. This means short-term weather events, such as an early sunset or unexpected drops in wind, won’t be as much of an issue.

Natural gas is expensive during peak hours, and making it easier to shift towards cheaper renewable resources in real-time with the support of batteries will mean a more resilient grid.

What does this mean for Battery Players?

It’s unclear yet how this story will impact long-term battery revenue opportunities. On the one hand, it could be positive for the points shared above: batteries are finally getting their moment in the sun (pun intended). 

But others wonder: if batteries are no longer as scarce, and there is no longer as much volatility in the market thanks to these stabilizing mechanisms, the price for storage / batteries will be impacted (i.e., they aren’t called on as the reserve as often, where they could command premium prices).

In Summary for Buyers

The RTC+B project is a generational leap for the ERCOT market – and we’ve been baking this into our forecasts for a while. REsurety forecasts model this new change under a wide range of scenarios to help you develop a comprehensive view of changing asset or contract values in this new RTC+B world.

For the energy buyer, this successful implementation should deliver key results: increased grid reliability and lower total costs to the system.

  • Lower Total Costs: Driven by multi-billion-dollar projected market savings through more efficient dispatch, smarter scarcity pricing, and optimized resource utilization. Coupled with the story of rising demand and straining supply potentially pushing prices higher, prices for batteries might rise, but the system should see lower total costs.
  • Increased Grid Reliability: All else equal, RTC+B stands to deliver on this goal. Skyrocketing load may impact grid reliability overall, but this will certainly cushion the blow.

With the emergence of these more evolved bidding strategies and the ability to recommit batteries in the real-time, storage investors may be able to expect the way batteries make money to change yet again. All in, from a contracting perspective – buyers exploring the market will want to take a look at hybrid vs. standalone project dynamics, and consider Day-Ahead/Real-Time Spreads when determining strategy.

The Power Market is Evolving. REsurety’s Forecasting Team is Growing in Response

Introducing Mark O’Brien to REsurety, a seasoned forecaster to lead Power Markets

Mark O’Brien
Senior Director
Power Markets

This month, REsurety welcomes Mark O’Brien to lead Power Markets, the team responsible for our WeatherSmart forecasts that drive our CleanSight platform. 

Mark brings over two decades of deep experience in fundamental energy forecasting and power markets. Before joining REsurety, Mark spent 24 years with American Electric Power (AEP) in Columbus, Ohio, a tenure that has given him a unique perspective on the energy transition.

Mark’s career at AEP was split between engineering and fundamental forecasting. Working on the generation side of the vertically integrated utility, his team’s forecasts were crucial for market strategy and rate setting.

Forecasting: It’s all Fundamental 

When asked what has changed about fundamental forecasting since he began his career, Mark takes a measured approach. Sure, the tools are more sophisticated, but “forecasts, including the factors I look at when building them, have not fundamentally changed over my years – although, the driving factors shaping outcomes have. Previously, energy credits or demand-side economics might have driven the story.

“Today’s power market is fundamentally different. Load growth from data centers is ‘the story’ that ended over a decade of stagnation and exposed a lack of investment in new energy generation in the United States. The necessity to build new capacity, on an unprecedented scale, coupled with a lack of experience in such large-scale construction, is creating challenges.”

A Look Ahead: Forces Shaping the U.S. Energy Landscape

Mark agrees that the U.S. is at a crossroads when it comes to energy. “We’re in a world where short-term realities – the pressure to meet load now – are bumping up against long-term requirements and what it will cost to reliably deliver that power in the future. While solar and battery storage have recently dominated new capacity additions, power market constraints are now pushing utilities toward other cost-effective solutions like natural gas in the immediate term, with the sentiment being: ‘I’d love to be green, but I also want to serve the load.’”

The complexity is further driven by state and local economic policies. In both regulated and deregulated markets, new energy infrastructure projects (particularly those necessary to serve data centers and large industrial loads) are frequently met with regulatory incentives—such as expedited permitting, tax abatements, or customized rate tariffs—due to their significant promise of job creation and increased tax revenue. Mark thinks there will be some noise in pricing, with some wildly optimistic – and pessimistic – predictions catching air time as the country sorts out how to meet this new moment in history.

But according to Mark, good fundamental forecasts are all the same: agnostic to energy source and focused on economics. “Ultimately, serving the load requires a diverse fuel mix. It requires a nuanced understanding of how long power takes to get to market, by source, and experience following economic trends that may dictate consumer behavior. I look forward to bringing this rigor to REsurety’s forecasts.”

We look forward to Mark’s insights.

Want to learn more about what makes REsurety’s forecasts so special? Check out more in our recent blog post.