Tag: Energy Finance

What will U.S. Intervention in Venezuela Mean for Clean Energy Prices?

Venezuela Oil Impact On Clean Energy

REsurety policy experts weigh in.

We’ve been monitoring the 2026 Venezuela intervention closely to understand its impact on domestic natural gas markets. 

Why? 

Because the price of crude oil ripples through the entire energy complex, ultimately dictating the financial health of renewable energy contracts. 

Let us take a moment to explain. 

Global oil production has an indirect yet significant influence on gas availability—specifically through “associated gas” produced in U.S. oil fields. A natural byproduct of drilling for oil is natural gas – It’s a “package deal”—you can’t extract the oil without releasing the gas. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), this byproduct now accounts for approximately 40% of total U.S. natural gas production.

This vast supply of low-cost associated gas serves as the primary fuel source for the thermal plants that set the market-clearing price for power. Because electricity prices are so tightly coupled to these fuel costs, any fluctuation in the natural gas market—driven by global oil trends—becomes a primary driver of long-term power price forecasts, including WeatherSmart forecasts like REsurety’s.

How the ramp up of oil production takes place in Venezuela will make a difference for the future of the clean energy market by shifting the economics of producing, selling, or buying PPAs. 

While change is coming, it’s not arriving overnight. According to recent analysis from Rystad Energy (January 2026), returning Venezuela to its peak production of 3 million barrels per day would require a staggering $183 billion in investment and would not be fully realized until 2040.

REsurety has created three scenarios about future energy prices in the new world order, what this means for clean energy, and trigger moments to watch for along the way – read on to learn more.

What will U.S. Intervention in Venezuela Mean for Clean Energy Prices?

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Navigating volatility in the US PPA Market: Market insights, pricing trends, and the need for more transparency

Navigating Volatility in the US PPA Market: Webinar

Join REsurety on February 5th at 1 PM in Partnership with S&P Energy.

Hear from: Owen Glubiak, Vice President of Business Development, Rob Keene, Senior Director, Bruno Brunetti, Director, Head of Renewable Revenue Streams and Annalisa Jeffries, Associate Director, Price Reporting.

The US Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) market is undergoing rapid transformation, with volatility fueled by shifting policies, commodity price swings, and evolving buyer demand. Price transparency is essential to navigate through this uncertainty for developers, buyers, financiers and anyone else transacting in the PPA markets. 

This February, join experts from S&P Global Energy Horizons, S&P Global Energy Platts, and REsurety for an in-depth webinar exploring the current status of the US PPA market—the drivers, who’s contracting clean energy, which technologies are leading the way and what trends we are likely to see. 

As we gear up to launch new price assessments including transactional data from REsurety’s CleanTrade platform—the first CFTC-approved marketplace for as generated clean energy—we will also showcase exclusive pricing insights and trends to help you navigate this dynamic environment.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Gain Clarity in a Volatile Market: Learn how enhanced price transparency and real-time data can empower energy market participants to make informed decisions amid rapid change.
  2. Identify Key Market Movers: Discover which organizations are actively contracting clean energy and which technologies are shaping the future of US PPAs.
  3. Leverage New Pricing Intelligence: Preview actionable pricing trends and insights from CleanTrade to stay ahead in contract negotiations and market strategy.

What will U.S. Intervention in Venezuela Mean for Clean Energy Prices?

Venezuela Oil Impact On Clean Energy

REsurety policy experts weigh in. 

We’ve been monitoring the 2026 Venezuela intervention closely to understand its impact on domestic natural gas markets. 

Why? 

Because the price of crude oil ripples through the entire energy complex, ultimately dictating the financial health of renewable energy contracts. 

Let us take a moment to explain. 

Global oil production has an indirect yet significant influence on gas availability—specifically through “associated gas” produced in U.S. oil fields. A natural byproduct of drilling for oil is natural gas – It’s a “package deal”—you can’t extract the oil without releasing the gas. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), this byproduct now accounts for approximately 40% of total U.S. natural gas production.

This vast supply of low-cost associated gas serves as the primary fuel source for the thermal plants that set the market-clearing price for power. Because electricity prices are so tightly coupled to these fuel costs, any fluctuation in the natural gas market—driven by global oil trends—becomes a primary driver of long-term power price forecasts, including WeatherSmart forecasts like REsurety’s.

How the ramp up of oil production takes place in Venezuela will make a difference for the future of the clean energy market by shifting the economics of producing, selling, or buying PPAs. 

While change is coming, it’s not arriving overnight. According to recent analysis from Rystad Energy (January 2026), returning Venezuela to its peak production of 3 million barrels per day would require a staggering $183 billion in investment and would not be fully realized until 2040.

REsurety has created three scenarios about future energy prices in the new world order, what this means for clean energy, and trigger moments to watch for along the way – read on to learn more.

A blip in long-term prices, or a market shift?

The current plan to release 30–50 million barrels of seized oil provides a cyclical impact. Cyclical changes are temporary price swings driven by immediate supply-demand imbalances or short-term geopolitical events. These movements are mean-reverting, eventually returning to a historical baseline once the disruption passes. This temporary inventory flush (roughly two days of U.S. consumption) may dampen prices for a few weeks but does not alter long-term capacity.

While the release of seized oil may have a cyclical impact, there are more system-altering forces at play. The broader developments in Venezuela represent a fundamental structural shift in the energy landscape.

Oil produces "associated gas."

Structural changes represent fundamental shifts in the market’s underlying framework. For example, the rapid scaling of grid-scale storage has permanently changed how the grid manages peak demand, establishing a “new normal” from which the market does not return.

In the case of Venezuela, this is a long-term strategy to establish a lower global price floor. We have identified three potential scenarios through which this transition may reshape natural gas benchmarks and, consequently, downstream PPA capture rates – or revenue earned from PPAs.

The most likely of the scenarios is “Crude-Driven Supply Contraction,” which is the best case scenario for the clean energy PPA market. In this scenario, Venezuela’s oil industry internationalizes — driving down oil prices and in so doing, inadvertently drives the price of natural gas up as the U.S. cuts back on drilling. Clean energy sources look even better in comparison, and investment into clean energy should follow. On the other hand, a world in which the U.S. reacts to Venezuela oil production with its own ramp up in production could be difficult for clean energy: with energy prices at a low, the business case for investment in clean energy — or any energy source — may look less favorable.

Impact of Venezuelan Oil on Clean Energy Capture Rates

Source: REsurety analysis.

REsurety’s Power Markets team, led by Mark O’Brien, is following this topic closely. Reach out to learn more about the impacts on your business.

ERCOT’s RTC+B: A Multi-Billion Dollar Upgrade for Texas Energy Buyers

A landmark shift has arrived in the Texas wholesale electricity market. 

ERCOT’s Real-Time Co-optimization plus Batteries (RTC+B), which went live on December 5, 2025, brings batteries into the pricing conversation for the first time. This market design is expected to translate into lower prices and more reliability for energy consumers by helping the grid more efficiently reflect supply and demand from a variety of energy production sources.

Here is a breakdown of what the RTC+B changes mean for you as an energy buyer or investor.

What RTC+B Means: The Promise of Lower Costs, Backed by Data

Smarter Pricing, Lower Volatility

If you take away nothing else from this post, remember that RTC+B is the simultaneous co-optimization of both energy and Ancillary Services. Ancillary Services are core operating functions that make the grid run efficiently, like voltage or frequency control through transmission wires, back-up power supply, and more – including batteries. 

By combining the energy itself and the support functions that make the energy flow efficiently, ERCOT can have the flexibility to dispatch resources in real-time – especially batteries – to respond to moment-to-moment shifts in demand.

A Shift in Scarcity Pricing

Until now, ERCOT has used a typical Operating Reserve Demand Curve (ORDC) for pricing, which implements price changes as energy resources on the grid are scarce. Producers of energy who were ready to go online in the case where supply dipped, like batteries, were compensated for it; energy users (demand-side) were incentivized to use less energy or risk paying higher prices. However, this didn’t take into account the difference in value for each of these back-up solutions.

Now, this ORDC for scarcity pricing is being replaced with individual Ancillary Service Demand Curves (ASDCs). These ASDCs create a demand curve for each specific type of ancillary service, showing the value of each of these solutions to grid stability. For the first time, batteries are being incorporated into the bidding process – which could change the game.

Projected Cost Savings

The shift is expected to deliver massive economic benefits. ERCOT’s Independent Market Monitor (IMM) has projected wholesale market savings of $2.5-$6.4 billion annually in reduced energy costs.

The Battery Revolution is Integrated for Stability

The “plus Batteries” (RTC+B) component is a major win for grid reliability and flexibility, benefiting every buyer.

For the first time, Energy Storage Resources (ESRs), like large-scale batteries, are fully integrated and modeled as a single device with a state-of-charge. This allows the real-time market to capture their full capability—both charging (consuming power when it’s cheap and plentiful) and discharging (injecting power during times of peak demand).

This will benefit renewable integration – faster, smarter responses to the uncertainty that comes along with solar and wind power are easier to manage when their generation is combined with backup power from batteries. Better asset utilization can lead to a reduction in total system costs by preventing the wasteful curtailment of clean, free solar power. This means short-term weather events, such as an early sunset or unexpected drops in wind, won’t be as much of an issue.

Natural gas is expensive during peak hours, and making it easier to shift towards cheaper renewable resources in real-time with the support of batteries will mean a more resilient grid.

What does this mean for Battery Players?

It’s unclear yet how this story will impact long-term battery revenue opportunities. On the one hand, it could be positive for the points shared above: batteries are finally getting their moment in the sun (pun intended). 

But others wonder: if batteries are no longer as scarce, and there is no longer as much volatility in the market thanks to these stabilizing mechanisms, the price for storage / batteries will be impacted (i.e., they aren’t called on as the reserve as often, where they could command premium prices).

In Summary for Buyers

The RTC+B project is a generational leap for the ERCOT market – and we’ve been baking this into our forecasts for a while. REsurety forecasts model this new change under a wide range of scenarios to help you develop a comprehensive view of changing asset or contract values in this new RTC+B world.

For the energy buyer, this successful implementation should deliver key results: increased grid reliability and lower total costs to the system.

  • Lower Total Costs: Driven by multi-billion-dollar projected market savings through more efficient dispatch, smarter scarcity pricing, and optimized resource utilization. Coupled with the story of rising demand and straining supply potentially pushing prices higher, prices for batteries might rise, but the system should see lower total costs.
  • Increased Grid Reliability: All else equal, RTC+B stands to deliver on this goal. Skyrocketing load may impact grid reliability overall, but this will certainly cushion the blow.

With the emergence of these more evolved bidding strategies and the ability to recommit batteries in the real-time, storage investors may be able to expect the way batteries make money to change yet again. All in, from a contracting perspective – buyers exploring the market will want to take a look at hybrid vs. standalone project dynamics, and consider Day-Ahead/Real-Time Spreads when determining strategy.